Federal Judge Rules Trump’s Sanctuary City Order Likely Unconstitutional
Federal Judge Rules Trump’s Sanctuary City Order Likely Unconstitutional

Federal Judge Rules Trump’s Sanctuary City Order Likely Unconstitutional

News summary

A federal judge in California has blocked the Trump administration from enforcing executive orders that aimed to deny or condition federal funds to so-called 'sanctuary cities'—jurisdictions that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Judge William Orrick ruled that the orders were likely unconstitutional, echoing similar findings from 2017, and issued a preliminary injunction preventing the administration from withholding, freezing, or conditioning federal funds to these cities and counties. The court found the orders violated constitutional principles, including the separation of powers, the Spending Clause, and the Tenth and Fifth Amendments, by usurping congressional authority and coercing local officials to enforce federal immigration law. The ruling affects more than a dozen municipalities, including several in California, Minnesota, New Mexico, Connecticut, Washington, and Oregon. The judge also required the administration to notify all federal departments and agencies of the injunction. The Justice Department had argued the cities lacked standing, but the court disagreed, citing potential irreparable harm and budgetary uncertainty for the affected jurisdictions.

Story Coverage
Bias Distribution
100% Unrated
Information Sources
Coverage Details
Total News Sources
1
Left
0
Center
0
Right
0
Unrated
1
Last Updated
10 days ago
Bias Distribution
100% Unrated
Related News
Daily Index

Negative

22Serious

Neutral

Optimistic

Positive

Ask VT AI
Story Coverage

Related Topics

Subscribe

Stay in the know

Get the latest news, exclusive insights, and curated content delivered straight to your inbox.

Present

Gift Subscriptions

The perfect gift for understanding
news from all angles.

Related News
Recommended News